Search for: "John Does 1-29" Results 1 - 20 of 1,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2008, 6:28 pm
Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case in which the Magistrate Judge had dismissed and severed as to John Does 2-9 due to their misjoinder, but granted the RIAA's motion for discovery, the District Judge sustained the rulings of the Magistrate, over objections from both sides, in a July 29, 2008, decision.Now the RIAA has filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice.July 29, 2008, Decision affirming Magistrate Judge's rulingsNotice of… [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:37 am
Does 1-27, the Judge has denied all of the defendants' motions, and ruled that the case may proceed.The Judge agreed with the RIAA on every legal issue presented.October 29, 2008, decision*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal download upload peer to peer p2p file sharing filesharing… [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:09 pm by John Whitaker
Discount Video Center v Does 1-29 Answer Discount Video Center v Does 1 29 Complaint [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
Does 1-9, the Columbus, Ohio, case targeting Ohio State University, where three defendants --John Does #1, 5, and #9 -- have made motions, the Court has stayed enforcement of its ex parte order.Also we have obtained copies of the motion papers served on behalf of John Does #5 and 9. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Cohen agreed with Westchester County that the petition improperly names John Does "1" through "100" as Petitioners.The court said that although CPLR 1024 provides for the naming of unknown parties as defendants in an action, it does not provide for the naming of unidentified Petitioners in an Article 78 proceeding.The judge also faulted the Association for failing to come forward with any statutory authority for naming unknown Petitioners,… [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:44 pm by Benjamin Justus
Does 1-29 Filed: 07/16/2015 Case No: 4:15-cv-02051 Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm by David Oscar Markus
By John Byrne Former Miami Dolphins head coach Brian Flores has sued the Dolphins, Giants, Broncos, NFL, and Jon Doe teams 1-29 in federal court in New York. [read post]
31 May 2018, 1:22 pm by Cordisco & Saile Web Team
Radio Host: At the same time where does it go from there John, to when you discover and things like that, where does it go from there after that, for what you do? [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-16, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the lower court denying a motion to quash.The appeals court held that the order was appealable, but rejected John Doe #3's arguments that :-the district court was without authority to refer the motion to the Magistrate Judge;-the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright infringement; -the "fair use" defense barred plaintiffs' case; and-the papers… [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:19 pm
Adding 30 years to those dates (and remembering that there is no Year Zero in between 1 B.C. and 1 A.D.), would put the start of Jesus' ministry at the time Luke indicates, sometime after A.D. 29. [read post]